My understanding of dignity didn’t come from theory — it came from growing up in Montana in the 1960s and 70s with brown skin that tanned even darker in the summer. That meant I lived in a shifting space: sometimes treated as a minority, sometimes welcomed by the majority, always aware of how fragile acceptance could be. My childhood moved between rural Moccasin, college‑town Bozeman, and later Great Falls, before I earned my degrees at MSU and eventually headed to New York for graduate school.
But one of the most formative lessons came earlier, during the years my father was finishing his PhD at the University of Hawai‘i. Our family lived in Mānoa for parts of my second and fourth grades. That’s where I met George.
I arrived in the middle of September, a new kid dropped into a classroom where the social hierarchy was already cemented. George was the classmate everyone targeted — emotionally, physically, relentlessly. He carried himself like someone who had learned to expect harm. For reasons I didn’t fully understand at the time, we became friends. And something shifted. The bullying didn’t vanish, but it slowed. Sometimes the simple act of standing next to someone changes the weather around them.
Anthropologists like Margaret Mead later wrote about the risks of becoming too close to the “social pariah,” but I hadn’t read Mead yet. I was just a kid who saw another kid being hurt.
Then, as quickly as I had arrived, I left. My family returned to Montana before the school year ended. The very next day, George was beaten badly enough that his parents finally pulled him out of the school.
That experience has stayed with me for decades. I’ve watched the same game of dignity versus contempt play out in classrooms, workplaces, communities, and politics. I’ve lived it from both sides — as someone marked as “other,” and as someone occasionally welcomed into the majority. And I’ve seen how quickly contempt spreads when no one interrupts it, and how powerfully dignity grows when even one person chooses to stand with someone who’s been pushed to the margins.
This is why dignity is not an abstract value for me. It is a fundamental human right — and a daily practice. It is the foundation for the work we do here, and the reason this page exists.
Dignity is the baseline condition that makes every other right possible. Without dignity, people are treated as objects to be managed rather than human beings to be engaged. When dignity is denied, trust collapses, conflict escalates, and communities lose the ability to solve problems together. When dignity is protected, people feel seen, valued, and capable of participating in public life. That’s why dignity isn’t just a moral ideal — it’s the foundation of a healthy democracy and a functional community.
The Dignity Index promotes this right by giving communities a shared framework for recognizing when language honors or violates human dignity. By naming the difference between contempt and respect, the Index helps people identify harmful patterns early, interrupt escalation, and choose communication that protects everyone’s humanity. It turns an abstract value — dignity — into a practical, everyday skill that strengthens relationships, reduces polarization, and builds the conditions for collaborative problem‑solving.
Our community is navigating real challenges — water security, infrastructure, public safety, housing, climate impacts, and the daily pressures on families. When public conversations collapse into contempt, we lose the ability to solve problems together.
The Dignity Index gives Billings a framework for:
Reducing polarization in public meetings
Supporting healthier civic engagement
Strengthening coalitions across differences
Helping residents recognize when language escalates conflict
Modeling communication that protects everyone’s humanity
This aligns directly with PUB’s mission: empowering people, building trust, and strengthening democratic culture.
PUB is adopting the Dignity Index as a guiding framework for community education and coalition work. That includes:
Applying the Index to public statements, forums, and civic events
Modeling dignity‑based communication in our own materials
Offering short trainings and workshops for partners
Creating tools residents can use to evaluate discourse in their own spaces
Inviting organizations, schools, and civic groups to join a dignity‑in‑discourse pilot
This turns the Index from a concept into a community practice.
Official Dignity Index page: https://timothyshriver.com/dignity-index (timothyshriver.com in Bing)
(There is no standalone book publication yet — the official site is the primary source.)
Podcast episode page: https://www.buzzsprout.com/ (Episode 145: Promoting Civility and Dignity in Utah)
UWLP main site: https://www.usu.edu/uwlp
Primary report page: https://www.moreincommon.com/publications/the-perception-gap (moreincommon.com in Bing)
Full report PDF and overview: https://www.moreincommon.com/our-impact/americas-perception-gaps (moreincommon.com in Bing)
Institute for Civility homepage (primary source): https://www.instituteforcivility.org
Publisher listing (Penguin Random House): https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/
Publisher page (Yale University Press): https://yalebooks.yale.edu